FANDOM


Things

GasMaskPsychoHatGuy
AuronKaizer - "Ho ho ho! If it isn't fat stinking billy goat Billy Boy in poison? How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip oil? Come and get one in the yarbles, if you have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!"
TALK - THE LIST - GAMES - PIT OF RECKONING - SANDBOX - WALRUS GUMBOOT 16:20, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
Need to clarify some things here...first off, we need to settle on what to use the "found" parameter for. Editors have been inputting both the location where it is found and the person obtained from, sometimes both. We need to make up our minds on this.

Secondly, should the parameter be renamed so as to better elucidate the point of the parameter?

Triforce4
Triforce 14 — I have CDO. It's like OCD but the letters are in the correct order.
TALK CONTRIBUTIONS EDIT COUNT OTHER ADMINS
I think it needs to refer to how or where the item is obtained, whichever is more appropriate in each situation.

Price/materials/upgrades to/upgraded from

Maybe we could add optional fields for the above? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachasme (talkcontribs)

Seems good to me, although we would have to go through and change them all to include the fields and then add the information. It'd be worth it in my opinion. – zzi 23:40, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
We could do this and make future additions easier for ourselves by modularising the infobox templates. Have a look at User:Zachasme/Sandbox and the templates it uses.
I don't like incorporating fields that only apply to one game. We're including all this information anyway when we make a decision on what to call the damn article... --AuronKaizer! 21:48, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
Well, you're already incoorporating "effective against", which doesn't apply to most items. Price applies to many items, in multiple games. But the modularization idea stills stands. Also, what article? :-)--Zachasme (talk) 22:15, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
The article for the materials and upgrades from Skyward Sword; you can read/join the discussion here. Anyway, for the most part these do (or should) feature this information, just not on the articles themselves, but rather shops and the like (which are most likely linked to in the articles themselves, anyway). Consider for a moment what a nightmare an infobox would be with all that information. I'm not against including information like this in an item article itself, but infoboxes are another matter. --AuronKaizer! 01:48, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.