Should Legends be included?
Starting the discussion page, rather than arguing in edit comments. Link Lab and I seem to disagree over the inclusion of Hyrule Warriors Legends under 'Game(s)'. The 'conversation' has gone as follows:
- Link Lab: "Listing HWL isn't necessary as her appearance in HWL is no different to HW"
- [removes HWL and cleans up language regions]
- D0xis: "HW and HWL are in fact two different games"
- [re-adds HWL and adds to language regions]
- "Yes but unless there is a substantial new appearance, which there isn't, her appearance in HWL does not need to be noted in the infobox. Do not undo this again."
- [reverts change]
To clarify: I am creating this as a way to properly discus this matter. Such discussions should not be had in the editing comments. I still believe there is enough notable difference between the games (and more specifically Proxi's roll) to include it. I will be re-adding the meaning to the English name, but until we reach a consensus, I will refrain from adding HWL. ~D0xis of the V0id~(T|C) 15:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hmmm I can see why people would think it'd be redundant to add Hyrule Warriors Legends. It'd kind of be like adding Navi's appearances as Ocarina of Time and Ocarina of Time 3D. Not sure about Proxi though since I haven't played HWL so I'm not sure how different the games are. I know HWL added new stories and such, so if it's different/new enough from HW, then I don't see how it could do any harm to also add it under her appearances infobox. --Dany36 (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)