Now, I was gonna add this directly, but that would be too brazen. It doesn't really specifically concern this one page, but this is where I discovered it. Should the geographical location of... well, a location, be written down as its relative position on the global map, or like it's done here, its position on a location's own specific map, which in the Great Bay Coast's case, for example, would be east, and not north? --AuronKaizer! 08:06, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Can you say that again with different wording? I don't understand the difference between the two options, or what "east" is doing here.--FierceDeku 08:16, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
I think he's asking whether a location's location should be described based on where it is on the entire world map (e.g. western Termina) or on a smaller scale (e.g. easternmost section of the Great Bay Coast). I prefer the latter since it's more specific. Jedimasterlink (talk) 08:24, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
Ok. Yeah, describing relative to the smaller location is more specific and helpful. For example, it wouldn't help people locate anything specific if we called everything in Great Bay "west".--FierceDeku 08:32, January 19, 2011 (UTC)


Where does that last sentence about a Zora getting thrown out come from?--FierceDeku 08:21, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

It's an inference, I think. The Zora outside the fortress never says he got thrown out; he only talks about what happens if you get caught. He does say he tried to "check them out", but unless he can see through solid rock, he must have tried to get into the fortress. Jedimasterlink (talk) 08:32, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
I did that mostly from memory. Wasn't as obvious as I remembered, but I'm confident that's what he was implying. --AuronKaizer! 08:41, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.