Why has so much of the story and detail been removed from this article? Happyjoe6 16:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I think LadyNorbert did it to conform all the different LA dungeon pages. I plan on re-integrating it later after we set a permanent manual of style for dungeon pages. --AuronKaizerAccolades! 17:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
No LA dungeon can have a story section just because some of them don't? That's completely unnecessary and ridiculous. Making them all similar in style is fair enough, but actually taking out content to make them conform is just counter-productive. By that logic no-one should ever edit the wiki unless they want to add something to every article in the same category. You can't expect anyone to do that. Any how's it meant to work if someone comes along and does want do write story sections for all 9 LA dungeons? As soon as they do the first one that one is then not conforming to the rest, so it should be reverted. This idea makes adding anything impossible.
And taking out something just so can add it back in makes no more sense. The point of a wiki is to provide information. Why should people who visit the page in between information being removed and re-added not be given that information?Happyjoe6 13:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
There appears to be a misunderstanding here. I'm not gonna question LadyNorbert's judgment in any way, but I think she had a good reason for it. You should ask her. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 13:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

It's been a couple of months and there's been no re-integration of the information and no explanation of why it was removed or why it shouldn't be in the article. I'm putting it back in. Happyjoe6 12:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.