It's just a generic, stereotypical bug design. Nothing more.
Well I saw it as they both have a main body and four legs, and they could possibly be the larval stage of the blue tektites. Should I mention this as a possibility that hasn't been confirmed? Dark Ridley 21:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I seriously think that's stretching it...Nintendo's probably just running out of ideas.
I'm sure people are searching the word "bug" to try and get SS information, and they aren't getting it right now. I say we move this article to "Bug (Ocarian of Time/Majora's Mask)" and make a "Bug (Skyward Sword)" page. That would keep the two instances separate, therefore preventing us from needing to deal with a generic "Bug" page which would have to cover all the insect like things in the series.--FierceDeku 00:34, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
I agree. As a matter of fact, I was trying to look up SS bugs a while ago, and couldn't find anything other than each individual page. There needs to be some sort of general page for all the SS bugs. Your suggestion sounds good. —CeilingMaster 01:07, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
I also agree, though the generic "bug" page could probably just be a disambig. There isn't much point in having a page that gives info on all the insects in the series when the individual pages already do that. Similarly, a disambig for the materials would also be a good idea. Jedimasterlink (talk) 01:33, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I meant to make the generic "Bug" page a disambig. The thing I was saying about a page which has to cover all bugs in the series is what we avoid by making two game-specific pages and no general one. Not sure what you mean about the materials, do you mean split the "Treasures" page into "Treasures (Phantom Hourglass/Spirit Tracks)" and "Treasures (Skyward Sword)"?--FierceDeku 01:39, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
Ah, never mind. I didn't realize we already had a collective page for those. Jedimasterlink (talk) 01:50, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
It really isn't much harder than adding a notice to this page, kids. --AuronKaizer! 03:19, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
I almost thought that would be better, but it would leave the question of deciding where to redirect a generic search query for "Bug". With SS bugs, OoT/MM bugs, and Golden Bugs, we would have three possible pages people could be looking for, and the first two of these are reasonable candidates for being the redirect destination. So, I still think a disambig would simplify navigation more efficiently. Jedimasterlink (talk) 08:20, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
If I'm interpreting what you're saying correctly AK, it would also be weird to have this be the straight up "Bug" page and only have the SS bugs use a "(game name)". Normally all the games would get their own page, and the page with no "(game name)" after it either covers all appearances of the thing or is a disambig.--FierceDeku 19:27, February 18, 2012 (UTC)