why did the picture change for this is it ok or not

What are you talking about? --AuronKaizer! 12:29, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

The picture changed from what it originally was for link

If you're talking about Link on the main page, then yeah, we updated it with Link from Skyward Sword. And yes, it is ok. TheMask-Mimic 23:48, July 8, 2011 (UTC)


Gleeok Skeleton (Oracle of Seasons)
Sir Real – Objectivism is the justification for the indefensible. A defiant plea for those who are already guilty. A twisted, revolting pseudo-philosophy that both exonerates and idolizes selfishness, greed, and a purposeful lack of concern for anyone but oneself.
I'm thinking a category for villains or antagonists could be useful. Are there any objections?

I just don't like the idea. Seems too gimmicky and potentially a difficult category for which to determine what exactly makes a character a "villain". Besides which, the list of final bosses lists a majority of these. --AuronKaizer! 20:45, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

It'd be good to have in the case of characters like Zant and the Twinrova who are major villains but not actually final bosses, but as AK said it would be difficult to draw a line on what makes someone a villain. Do they have to show up multiple times? Talk? We could try to decide villains on a case by case basis, though that might be messy. On the other hand, I feel like most people's opinions on which villains are significant will probably be so close together that we could just go down the list of games and choose who we wanted to include without much trouble. If we can get over the difficultly of defining them, a villains category could work in my opinion.--FierceDeku 21:56, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

Proposal: Addition of Guide Characters

I think that a recurring type of character could be called and categorized as a Guide Character. for example, Navi, Tatl, Midna, Fi, etc. All these characters accompany and help Link on his quest. Thoughts?

Above section. – zzi 18:31, December 3, 2011 (UTC)

OK. So, thats a no because it is hard to categorize them? Just making sure thats what "Above Section" is referring to.


Green Rupee – "Your true face... What kind of... face is it? I wonder... The face under the mask... Is that... your true face?" — Lunar Child
TALK – 06:34, March 14, 2018 (UTC) — EditcountContributions
The categories here are all positions held by characters like sage, prince, and queen. Pirates, to me, doesn't follow this pattern. Blacksmiths is also questionable. Being that these were created by RaphBlade7, I doubt anyone else agreed to these. Any objections to their deletion?
Wallmaster (Ocarina of Time)
Ceiling Master – "...Stand down. You're in my way, and the sight of your appalling hair makes my gorge rise." —Ghirahim
TALK Contributions · Editcount
None here. I thought we got all of these...
Heropon Riki Dance
WiseAdventurer – "Nyapakapow!" —Riki
TALK – {{{time}}} • EditcountContributions
I fully agree. RaphBlade7 acted according to one's own will and made new categories and incorrectly added categories to article leading to several warnings and this discussion. He later continued to act according to one's own will, created these new categories and managed them incorrectly despite the advices, warnings and this discussion. I managed some of them but it remains others such as the ones you have found or this one Category:Champions.
Green Rupee – "Also, you look amazing! Love the outfit! Not that it matters, since you WEREN'T INVITED!" — Bowser
TALK – 06:52, March 16, 2018 (UTC) — EditcountContributions
Ok, all done.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.