Zeldapedia:Requests for adminship/Archive 3

Triforce 14 (administrator)

 * Triforce 14 (talk · contributions · edit count)

Well, I've been around for about four to five months now (although I haven't been able to be on as much in the last month due to school and such), and I think I've made some pretty good contributions. As you may have noticed, there are quite a few admins already; however, very few (about 2-3) are actually active. I'm essentially running for the same reasons listed here. Anyway, I'm helpful and usually fairly kind towards other users. If you would like some examples of my major contributions, click here.

Votes

 * Arr! Ye are in truth one of the best users ZP has ever seen. Dedication, Wiki know-how and all that stuff. There couldn't be a better fit for adminship out there. Umm, somewhere along the way I forgot my pirate accent! Arr! Ye be drinking grog with us admins when ye pass! --Auron  Kaizer !  09:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I REALLY want to say support for this application, and I fully intend to eventually. However, we've had some users (Moblin Slayer for example) who've been on the wiki for nearing a year and we still haven't fully dealt with their applications either for the reason I'm saying wait here. Once you've reached at least the six-month mark, I think we could overlook the time-gap, but there needs to be a uniform standard applied to everyone who's applying for adminship. I do intend to change my vote to support once that amount of time has passed though because you've been a great editor for the wiki and I agree 100% with all that you said in your application. We just need to make sure we're not applying different standards to different applicants. Just a little bit longer (a month at most if you've been on for five already) and I will gladly change my vote to support. Hero of Time 87 14:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not to argue with you or anything, but shouldn't this be based on what I've done rather than other people's applications? I understand your position, but if their current applications are causing the problem, shouldn't a decision be made on a stalled request after a certain amount of time? For example, say after a month or two of inconclusive voting, a request could be considered opposed? Just a thought.—[[Image:Triforce4.png|15px]] Triforce   14 ( ... ) 17:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's beside the point. Adminship is based on both what you've done as well as depending a bit on how long you've been here. The only reason I'm saying wait is b/c I've told others before that they needed a little more time as well and it wouldn't seem right to tell one person that and not everyone else. I don't want it to seem like favorites are being played here. I fully support your bid, you could even consider my vote a "support" in waiting. But I still stand by my decision just so things are fair. But in a few weeks when you've surpassed a six-month anniversary of joining, then I will certainly change my vote to support. I would do it now, but I don't want it to seem like it's unfair to those who I've told this before. Hero of Time 87 20:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I understand. —[[Image:Triforce4.png|15px]] Triforce   14 ( ... ) 21:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please don't think this is anything about you though Triforce. I really do support your bid for adminship and in my view you deserve it, hence why I said you will definitely have a "support" vote from me, eventually. I just don't want some of the earlier applicants who had similar credentials to think they got a raw deal. You are correct, some of those applications need to be dealt with, but that's the only reason I've made my current vote a "wait." But I do want you to know I fully support your bid and will eventually change my vote to support b/c I've seen a great many useful edits from you and you've been very devoted to the wiki. You will make a great addition to the roll call of admins for ZP. In fact, why don't we say May 1st to be the day I do intend to make my vote a full support. That is about two to three weeks, and by that time you will have six months in, and nobody can say we did not check time on the wiki then. So May 1st I will make my vote a full support Triforce, that I promise. Hero of Time 87 22:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I know you don't have anything against me. I was just saying I understand why you voted the way you did. No hard feelings or nothin' :P—[[Image:Triforce4.png|15px]] Triforce   14 ( ... ) 23:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You have considerably more mainspace edits than me, and I'm already an admin.  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  23:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Go for it. You tell us about most of the vandals on this place. Do some killing yourself. Mr Kmil
 * Add my vote to your total. You definitely have what it takes.-- Bek  (talk)  02:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Didn't know I could vote, but you got mine. --EveryDayJoe45 02:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Really, it's obvious that you're a top-of-the-line contributor and would do well with the tools. McJeff 15:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)