Zeldapedia:Articles for deletion

As a wiki there will be some pages that are not up to standard. On this page, listed are articles up for deletion. All users are invited to participate in the discussions as to whether these articles should be deleted or not. The pages listed will be voted on to reach a consensus. Once a consensus has been reached or a length of time has passed, an administrator will review the discussion and decide what action should be taken.

How to list an article

 * 1) Put    on the page to be deleted and save.
 * 2) Come to this page and create a level 3 header ( ===Title of page=== ) discussing the deletion under the Pages listed for deletion header.

Speedy deletion
Found a blank page? A duplicate? A misspelling? A page filled with nonsense? Try instead using a speedy deletion. Simply type   on the page and the page will appear in Category:Speedy deletion candidates. An administrator will check the page and make a decision without the voting process.

=Pages listed for deletion=

Master Hand
This has nothing to do on a Zelda Wiki. --AuronKaizer 15:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Oath to Order 18:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Richard1990

Reject

 * 1) Whoever is directly involved with Zelda characters in Subspace can be kept IMO. DjMack 18:21, 29
 * 2) If we put in more about Ganondorf controlling him and things of that nature, we could keep it. X X X X X  Talk to me OR ELSE!  14:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Technically, it is linked to the Legend of Zelda series. Uber  Phoeb a b c 13:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment
[face_palm] I meant to put it in Reject. DjMack 21:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:Spoiler
Spoilers should be expected on a wiki. If we have a spoiler template, it would have to be used on every single page to get any use out of it. Wikis are meant for contributors and readers to go deep into the story, resulting in heavy spoilers. And not everyone's going to have the same idea of what a spoiler is anyway.--Richard 23:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Richard1990

Reject

 * 1) Oath to Order 19:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm against how Wikipedia do things. The best thing we can do is to stay away as best we can from Wikipedia's policy on matters. User:AuronKaizer AuronKaizer 21:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Keep it. Don't zap the thing. X X X X X '''  Talk to me OR ELSE!  17:13, 27 May 2008

Expansion Pak
Non-Zelda (other than it being necessary for Majora's Mask) related article which is mentioned few enough times for a simple Wikipedia link to suffice. --AuronKaizer 19:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Oath to Order 02:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) A simple wikilink will do. The name of the company sounds like a Final Fantasy character though..or a Pokemon. -- Auron  Kaizer  21:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Reject

 * 1) I checked it out, and it appears to be one hell of a pro setup. I believe we should keep mentionable fanstuffs here, so I'm saying we should keep this. -- Auron  Kaizer  21:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree, let it remain.

Comments
more stuff to it. Like a new storyline.
 * 1) Funny, I've heard of this game. I saw a dungeon being played on youtube. It's really a cool little game. The game even has

The entire Abbrevation Template Category and Abbreviation Templates
This is just pure laziness. Who in the Dark World (clever replacement for swearing, in your face God!) is lazy enough to have to use these? Honestly, if you don't feel like it, I'd be more than glad enough to do it for your lazy ass...err, yes. So, unnecessary and morally ambiguous. Keep or delete? You decide.-- Auron  Kaizer  18:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Oath to Order 19:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I didn't even know those existed.  Definitely unnecessary.  LadyNorbert 14:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) X X X X <font color="Green">X  <font color="Red">Talk to me OR ELSE!  17:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC) I think most of them are worthless, but I thought the z template I made was useful.

Treasure
This is an unnecessary page. All of the information contained on it is found in other articles. It's extremely non-specific and while I understand (I think) the creator's logic in setting it up, it really is rather extraneous. LadyNorbert 23:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) It's not exactly necessary. It's in good faith though! Sorry. -- Auron  Kaizer  23:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Reject
I redirected it. XXXXX 01:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments
I redirected it to treasure chest. That way, it gets some use. XXXXX 01:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Super Famicom
I don't get it...--Power courage wisdom and time 01:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Reject

 * 1) <font color="Green">X <font color="DeepSkyBlue">X <font color="Green">X <font color="DeepSkyBlue">X <font color="Green">X   <font color="Red">Talk to me OR ELSE!  18:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC) It's the Japanese Super Nintendo. It stands for Super Family Computer. It was changed to Super Nintendo in America because here, families don't all play together like the way they do in Japan. Rather sad, really.

Single Timeline Theory
I don't think its neccessary at all. Theories and all, and this one was proved wrong. --<font color="#990099">Murch (dah dah dahdaaaaaah!) 23:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I hate all theory pages. And this one is disproved and done away with. OtO con^_- 23:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I have two friends. The one is Zap, the other is It. -- Auron  Kaizer Kennedy! 05:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment
Hmm. Can't we just merge it with that godawful Timeline Theory project page instead? -- Auron  Kaizer Kennedy! 23:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Swords and Shields of the Legend of Zelda Series
Under the items category. Just seems like a way to take up space

Support

 * 1) ya just move it to items and weapons.--griff 03:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Same thing as Griff said. -- Auron  Kaizer Kennedy! 14:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Easily can be a section of the items and weapons, can I delete it when it has enough votes, i wanna test my new powers >:) Uber  Phoeb a b c 13:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Zeldapedia:Timeline Theory
Now before you get mad at me I am not suggesting we get rid of this article entirely but rather delete it from Zeldapedia and ship it to the Zelda Fanon Wiki. This was a nice article to have at first but it’s gotten overly long and has little relevance on this Wiki anymore. By shipping it to the Zelda Fanon Wiki not only goes to some place more relevant but it might jumpstart that Wiki as well. What do you think?--ShutUpNavi 03:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Wholeheartedly agree. Aeronflux 03:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) As per this, I say: "HELL YEAH!!!" OtO con^_- 03:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * XD, now this is strange - the "victory" part of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is playing right now. This is what's known as ironic justice. In the words of The Rock, I know what we can do with the article. We can shine it up real nice, turn it sideways, and STICK IT STRAIGHT UP YOUR CANDY ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...Or move it to the Zelda fanon wiki. Anyway, just do it. -- Auron  Kaizer Kennedy! 04:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Grrrr.... get rid of them. Friggin' about time.... --<font color="#990099">Murch (dah dah dahdaaaaaah!) 17:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Send it to hell Zelda Fanon Wiki! Uber  Phoeb a b c 14:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Reject

 * 1) don't delete it, Just turn it into a talk page. Solar flute 06:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC)