Talk:Gyorg

We've already merged the enemy and boss articles for Gibdo and Crow. Perhaps it's time for this to follow suit. 03:27, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
 * My opinion from the split last year still stands. Bosses and enemies are not the same thing. They only share a name and beyond that are absolutely nothing alike. Unlike those two which were from spinoff games, this isn't.— 08:23, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * So the two bosses share more similarities with each other than they do with the enemy? They only share a name and boss status, so why are they listed in the same article? 15:06, 31 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Because when a page is named "Gyorg (Boss)" it makes sense to mention a boss with the name "Gyorg".
 * As Matt said, this situation is arguably quite different. The Crow and Gibdo boss pages were stubby with little to no potential for growth. Besides, neither of them are canonical enemies. Dedicating a small section to them on the respective enemy pages made sense.
 * I think these pages are fine the way they are. Admittedly, this may be a bit of bias on my part since I'm the one who suggested and executed the split... I will say that the idea of re-merging these pages does have some merit. If others really feel like it's a good move (no pun intended), I'd go along with it. 19:17, 31 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Hyrule Castle has appeared as a place and as a dungeon, yet we don't have Hyrule Castle (place) and Hyrule Castle (dungeon), do we? Or Mothula (Miniboss) or Mothula (Boss). Even the recurring enemies and stuff may change according to the games, like the Forest Temple (which, name aside, all three incarnations are in completely different places). So I don't think the Gyorg enemy and boss have to be separated. -- 19:49, 31 October 2011 (EDT)
 * I agree with K2L. If these articles can be split, then why not Moldorm, Armos Knight, etc.? Splitting Moldorm bosses from regular Moldorms has a lot of merit, actually, especially if Gyorg somehow gets away with it, given how confusing the naming of those enemies is in comparison. Personally I think some of the dungeons should be split though, as while enemies change appearances but are essentially the same monsters with varying appearances and behavior, numerous dungeons are clearly different locations altogether, and you end up with a page with three entirely seperate sets of information. That's a discussion for a different page though, I guess. Fizzle 10:25, 15 January 2012 (EST)


 * I'd rather see all of those enemy pages split than this one merged, to be honest. The reason being bosses and enemies have always been defined as two different... shall we say... "classes". There's a pretty big distinction between them, not to mention our infoboxes for the two are quite different. To have all the right information we'd have to have two infoboxes on the same page. We've done that many times before, but for some reason I've never liked having more than one infobox on one page. It just doesn't feel right to me.
 * But, lately, it seems like most of our editors here have been leaning towards "mergism". I'm willing to go with the flow if no one else but me dislikes the re-merge.
 * For the record, I agreed to the merging of Crow and Gibdo because the non-canon information would never be anything more than side-note, and that complements the entire article. But in this case we have two rather different subjects, each with equal importance. I hope I'm making sense here... 12:32, 15 January 2012 (EST)

Boss mentioning
Should it be mentioned in trivia to it's name and design is similar to the boss and maybe a reference Darre (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2014 (UTC)