Forum:New Temple of Courage Layout.

Well, I am thinking, should we recreate the Temple of Courage so the layout looks a litte more, ah, Temple-ish? Please see this link. Okay, maybe a vote is in order?  Uber  Phoeb  00:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

All in favor

 * Well, I guess I don't count :P  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 00:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This is most certainly an interesting notion.

--Caiaphasthesympathist (talk) 02:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not.  Baltro [  talk  ] 02:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why not? (That was rhetorical, don't answer that.) -- Moblin   Slayer (Working on it...) 16:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think it would be cool! Admitidly, there will probobly need to be a some fine-tuning for the final product, but I'm all for a "Temple"-ish page. But lets keep the WWF smackdown style of the fights - thats just fun. [Kamari no Hyrule; 03:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)]
 * Yeah, looks pretty cool.Definetly needs more flair though, like you said.Not even sure if I can vote (being a new user and all)but it sounds good!-User:Hylianhero777
 * Don't you people see?! this will work! it will make Zeldapedia better! C'mon! don't you notice the backgrounds on Zelda wiki? we could do something like that in ToC! STICK WITH IT! GREAT IDEA!--Shade Link (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to change that. zeldafreak39
 * Not bad. could be shorter, and needs better pics for some things, but overall eye-catching and good. --Dekutulla (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC) Even if I can't vote...P.S: MO)RTHS!MORTHSMORTHSMORTHSMORTHS!*Gets carried away in a straight jacket, screaming "Why, Michael Jackson? WHY??"*
 * I'm supporting this, even if I don't think it's perfect in its current state, I know we'll get it fixed up before it actually gets put in the ToC. --Lisa UR A QT  01:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think this is a wonderfull idea,but it needs an example. --User:Nintendo fan

I think this will make zeldapedia much better! It will attract more people, if we have a something along these lines!! -- C 2   21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * lets do it why not im mean it cant be changed that much right??--User:Keatonew 00:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A face-lift would be nice. SageofWater (talk) 02:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I like the idea. Could use a redesign. Twilightwizard0309 (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure i'll go with it. BetweenBlack&White 11:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I will support a new Temple design- don't go overboard with the changes, though. Try to keep it simple. Signed, The Recondite Sage

All who oppose

 * I DRTJR the great like the current system of THE TEMPLE OF COURAGE DRTJRDRTJR (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * give me an example and this might become a support. I dub you sir cheesy opener.  Metroidhunter32  02:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We'd have to really do it right or it'll look tacky, so I'm just going to oppose until somebody comes up with a good design, when this will become a support. Unless that happens, this will stay as an oppose. If that thing on your sandbox is the best we've got, I have to oppose.  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  01:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  05:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Until you come up with something, no. Even if this wins with supports, it can't change unless there is an option to change to. Nah i don't like it.— Triforce   14 [[Image:Triforce4.png|link=Special:Contributions/Triforce 14|15px]] 16:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I need to see an example before I will change my vote. Sorry, but that's not too good.(Darknut15 (talk) 20:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC))
 * Interesting and kind of cool, but all it does is just require more scrolling to get down to the fight, making it fairly pointless. Also it may lag up things as well after a few weeks of fighting.  so...sorry, but I am going to have to decline.  Dialask77  Ice Wizard  [[Image:Ice Sorceror.png|30px]] 15:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks terible, this is my turf, and I say we forget all about this. So, just plain NO. Sincerely, Watcher.
 * I say no. Mr kmil
 * In the words of Jay Sherman, renowned film critic turned mental case, "it stinks". Constructive criticism, that you'll get from those who were fortunate enough in life to have a freakin' computer and mp3 player that works. --Auron  Kaizer !  16:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Change is good. But seriously, if done right, this could be REALLY cool. My faith in this has dwindled. I get that the sandbox deal is a rough draft only, but I need to see a good final version to give a support vote. Otherwise, I will move this to the oppose column. Moved. I apologize for the apparent fickleness. Jedi Master Link
 * I agree with Dialask, more scrolling is a bad thing. I say no. Turtleman579
 * My computer shuts down if I try to load a page with too much memmory and it already has trouble loading the ToC without this, sorry but no. Midna Rocks
 * Nope I think it's fine.  Peak  Province 
 * The current layout is perfect for voting, which is what ToC is all about. Any other design would ruin that. User:Redeadhunter

Comments/Concerns
Could you give us a idea of what it would look like in a sandbox?  Metroidhunter32  00:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, I just don't see a problem with the way it is— Triforce   14  01:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Metroid, I'd like to see it in a sandbox. Lisa UR A QT  01:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it should be really worth finding out whether or not we should vote for something if we don't know if the new layout will be better or worse. --Flashpenny (talk) 01:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, everyone has pretty much said it, and I'd like to see the new as well before I pass any judgement. Portal- Kombat  *Sysop*

I refuse to take either side in this until I see a possible sample. Besides, what is wrong with the way it is now? Dialask77 Ice Wizard   04:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC) It seems fine in its current state, but a sample of what it would look like redesigned is in order.(Darknut15 (talk) 04:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC))

Sandbox example, then I vote. -- Bek  (talk)  16:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I would just like to say, metroid: please read the ToC talk page.  Uber  Phoeb  17:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait, so the only change you want to make is to put in a "temple-like" opening paragraph? I thought you meant a whole new look and stuff.  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  21:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

same as every one else. lets see a sand box. Oni Dark  Link 22:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

OKAY I HAVE THE SANDBOX... IT WAS REALLY SHORT, BUT IT MIGHT CHANGE SOME VOTES (I see some people hate it). UNDERSTAND IT WAS DONE BY PEOPLE WITH LITTLE TO NO FORMATTING KNOWLEDGE, WHILE MOURNING THE LOSS OF A GREAT MUSIC GENIOUS (please see this) AND IS NOT THE BEST WE GOT. FEEL FREE TO CHANGE IT IF YOU WOULD LIKE THOUGH. HERE IT IS SORRY FOR THE CAPS!!!  Uber  Phoeb  03:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

EveryDayJoe45, does your crossed-out comment mean that you no longer oppose? And if so, why is your vote not in the supporting area?  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  18:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm changing to neutral on the issue. So i'm not supporting or opposing. But I just deleted my vote, to limit confusion. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Made a few changes, and I think it looks better than it did. What do y'all think?-- Bek  (talk)  18:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC) <!-- I like it better Bek. Flashpenny. I'm about to ban you for using Big Poe and Flash to vote. I'm deleting Flash's vote, and if you restore it, I'm banning you. Just tbh, I didn't think there would be as much support.  Uber  Phoeb  23:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Resized the images a bit so you don't have to scroll as much. Will change the colors to match the current design soon.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 23:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How can one know for certain whether two usernames are the same person (like you say Big Poe and Flashpenny are)?  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  23:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That's low dude, you have little-to-no basis for saying we are the same people and we're not. That's like saying I'm George Bush just because I say I agreed with his policies. --Flashpenny (talk) 01:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol. u agreeed with someone who destroyed our country. That's not the point. I can track IP's using my handy dandy awesome computer. You guys only edit from the same IP. Along with that, Big poe=Nice Guy and you seem to have the exact same ideas. Along with that, it was created after you were banned (really close to the banning). AND it was created using the same IP as Flashpenny. Now don't even say he edits only when he is at your house, because that is barely beleivable.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 01:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Huh, that IP stuff is some pretty weird stuff. I'm gonna have to find out what's up with that. That being said lots of people have the same ideas about stuff. Generally best friends do that. There's a difference between friends who have similar theories and sycophants. We do have different ideas about certain theories however and to be quite frank different personalities as far as swearing and friendliness goes. --Flashpenny (talk) 01:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So ur saying that ur a jerk and he's nice? And that you swear? Maybe I should ban you for a week for swearing...  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 01:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * OK now you lost me. --Flashpenny (talk) 01:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How 'bout I say this. Since I know you have two usernames... if you admit it, I'll just permaban Big Poe, but if you don't I'll permaban both of you.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 02:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll admit then. Not because it's true but because my hands are tied here and I don't wanna get banned again (this still counts as admitting in a way so permaban Big Poe). --Flashpenny (talk) 02:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait. You just said it wasn't true. Therefor NOT admitting it... And anyway, that means, without conversing with your friend, you just got him banned. So who do you think your kidding?  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 02:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll say I'm Big Poe and admit puppetry just because I see I'm fighting a losing battle. Quite frankly I abused it as my acting skills and Internet humiliation is the best kind for maturing at 13. So I admit puppetry, we're one in the same and I hope no one will quite frankly hate me for this because most of the negative, jerk-sih traits were fake. I'm still getting blocked for puppetry aren't I? --Flashpenny (talk) 02:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. You're both getting banned for trying to trick me when I clearly know you still want to keep your account, and make sure Big poe is banned. Just to let you know, your IP is being banned so you wont make another account. And don't worry, i'll track it, and make sure anyone else tracks it, too.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 02:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I made him up because I was blocked for 3 months. That might have something to do with it. --Flashpenny (talk) 02:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You probably would be let off the hook right here if you didn't try to hoodwink us. But overocming a block with a puppet is grounds for indefinitely being blocked. Sorry, you really should have just admitted it when UP asked you because he clearly knows you edit from the same IP. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

--> Wow, drama. 03:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)MaloMart (talk)

It's solved. Truthfully this has nothing to do with this.— Triforce   14  03:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't like the way things are looking. With so many supports and so many opposes, I can just tell that there's going to be an upset on the losing side no matter what happens.  Xykeb   Yvolix   Zraliv  07:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

How do you add backgrounds? Maybe we can add a Temple-ish background behind it, and some great textures for the text and stuff. That will be GREAT!--Shade Link (talk) 11:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not the best html man, but I've never seen a background image. Only transparent images with stuff on top of them. I dunno if I could do that with wikimarkup.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 15:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw one yesterday, asked a dev of the site to tell me how to do it, but he said he didn't know, and the webmaster left. Sadness.  Uber  Phoeb Link_standing_ALTTP.png‎ 05:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The vote's up to +6 now. Unless 7 opposes come in the next day, I think it's safe to say Zeldapedia wants change.  Uber  Phoeb  05:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, it looks like we're supporting this. However...before it's implemented, people want it to look fancier. Could anyone who's REALLY good with wiki markup help? Thanks  Uber  Phoeb  00:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

So, when is the voting gonna be over and we do whatever with the ToC?--Shade Link (talk) 14:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

If we changed the layout would we change the archives layout too? That might cause problems, unless someone could show me an example of the new layout and assure me that it wouldn't screw anything up then i'm voting no.  Peak  Province 

No. Archives are meant to let people see how things were not are. Mr kmil