Talk:Ice Ring Isle

Scrapped Dungeon Theory
I have no personal problem with this theory, but one thing that has bothered me about it here is the mention of Ice Ring Isle, along with Fire Mountain and Greatfish, being marked on the Sea Chart, whereas the only other marked islands are the "plot-important ones", and that at the time the map was made, the three islands may have been "equally important". My problem with this, and the reason for which I think it should be removed, is that this comment makes it seem as though these islands aren't important, even though you are required to visit and explore all three of them in order to advance the plot. Also, crucial to the plot or no, being marked on the chart does not automatically equate to having a dungeon that was ultimately scrapped, as the islands Windfall and Outset are both dungeon-free and are still marked. It's just as equally possible that Fire Mountain and Ice Ring Isle were marked so that players would know where to go in order to enter their respective temples - even if they had gotten them charted previously, it would've been easy to forget, and so marking them on the chart would've saved people the trouble of having to go looking for them. Mistress Fi (talk) 06:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We are eventually moving all the theories to the ZU forums, so don't worry too much about them. 19:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)